I'm reluctant to take a side in this internecine squabble because a) people I know on both sides of the issue are making valid arguments, b) I don't have the authority or inclination to act as arbitrator or mediator, and c) first-hand experience with WPFW instructs me not to volunteer solutions for a hot mess. Nevertheless, I've compiled a brief list of my initial reactions to the station's latest melodrama:
- WPFW retains enough autonomy to address its challenges
- the station's culture is dysfunctional
- the amount of programming devoted to local issues continues to steadily and precipitously decline
- Pacifica appears to be making station policy contrary to its core principles
- the station's management and station board members lack imagination and nerve, if not tact
- station resources are vastly underutilized
- the new schedule's evening jazz programming is an improvement
- its listener base is aging, shrinking, and contributing less.
- many of WPFW's 'publics' (volunteers, listeners, artists, etc.) put personal agendas ahead of the best interests of the station or its community of license
- the ongoing strife at WPFW symbolizes in the U.S., 'public' stations aren't so public; 'progressive' media isn't always progressive.